-
We
view the community as a system comprised of a complex
tapestry of interconnected conversations. Thinking
systemically will help us to identify the various "stakeholder"
groups in the community and involve them in our project.
Additionally, it enables us to see each step of the project
as a series of "conversational turns" in which what occurs
in one series of meetings is incorporated into the next
round of discussions; each discussion growing out of one
context and affecting the next context.
-
We
view the community as a "multiverse" containing many social
worlds. In addition to interconnected conversations,
the community is comprised of stakeholder groups with
different and sometimes, conflicting ideas of what their
community should be. We see these differences as enriching
rather than problematic.
-
We
involve the public in the project from the beginning.
We think if community building is to take place, residents
need to be involved throughout the project.
-
We
believe there should be support from the top for initiatives
from the bottom. Most residents are not interested
in "just talk," instead they want to see the connection
between their ideas and community initiatives and action
steps. We think it's crucial for city government to recognize
and support resident involvement and for residents to
feel heard. This often requires creating new places for
quality communication to occur between residents and community
leaders.
-
We
treat language as "fateful" and recognize that the
way issues are framed and discussed affect the "outcomes
as well as the level of trust and respect among the various
stakeholders. Therefore, we always work collaboratively
with the community.
-
We
see the entire community process as a series of dialogic
conversations. We think of dialogue as the ability
to state your perspectives, values, and desires while
remaining open to the perspectives, values, and desires
of others. We think that engaging in this form of communication
creates the conditions for trust and respect and opens
up possibilities for enriched actions.
-
We
recognize our own role in the "system." Although we
are not members of the community, we realize that whenever
we facilitate a discussion or attend meetings of community
stakeholders, our presence makes a difference. We need
to continually remind ourselves that as facilitators we
must remain neutral with regard to the outcome of community
decisions, but we are passionate about the process in
which those decisions are made. The process is one in
which our role is to be on everybody's side and in which
all parties feel heard